Reading time
3
Min
Summary

Request a demo

See how our solution helps HR leaders boost engagement and reduce absenteeism.

People Management & HR Strategy
category-filter
Created on
October 3, 2025
• Updated on
October 3, 2025
8
Min

Performance Reviews and Stress: Breaking the Cycle of Anxiety

stress in performance reviews

The performance review—often referred to simply as the annual review—is designed to give employees dedicated time with their manager. It’s an opportunity to reflect on the past months, acknowledge progress, and discuss solutions to challenges.

Yet many employees dread this moment, which can become a source of anxiety. Why does a professional conversation so often turn into something stressful? How can it be seen as an opportunity rather than a threat? What techniques help reduce stress?

This article answers these questions to support employees in approaching reviews more calmly, while also helping HR teams promote best practices internally and guiding managers to better understand the stress their teams may experience ahead of performance reviews.

Why Do Performance Reviews Trigger Anxiety?

Annual reviews concentrate unspoken expectations and symbolic weight: they often sum up an entire year of work in a single meeting. For many, it’s the only—or at least the most formal—moment to discuss achievements, challenges, and areas for growth.

Employees may also perceive the review as a reminder of managerial power. Managers often appear to hold all the keys to raises or career progression, which intensifies the pressure.

Anxiety may be even greater in contexts of economic uncertainty or, conversely, during rapid growth phases. Hypergrowth is closely linked to mental health risks: employees may fear consequences such as unavailable managers focused on other priorities, or lack of long-term clarity.

Finally, fear of judgment and loss of control frequently appear: employees may experience stress, apprehension, or fear of disappointment—fueling anxiety ahead of the meeting.

What Lies Behind Review-Related Stress

Stress can undermine the effectiveness of a review. While every individual reacts differently, common effects include:

  • Loss of confidence and self-censorship: stress may trigger hypervigilance, leading employees to underestimate themselves, avoid voicing requests, downplay achievements, or anticipate their manager’s reactions instead of expressing their own.
  • Decision paralysis: difficulty making choices when options are presented, leading to delays or avoidance.
  • Catastrophizing: imagining worst-case scenarios, which reinforces stress in a vicious cycle.
  • Emotional withdrawal: as a self-protection reflex, employees may struggle to express feelings, avoid asking for moral support, or fear being misunderstood or judged.

Reframing the Review as a Constructive Exchange

To transform reviews from a stressful ordeal into a constructive dialogue, both managers and employees can take steps to reinterpret the purpose of the conversation.

  • Separate evaluation from pay: managers can structure the conversation in parts, avoiding a direct link between performance feedback and salary negotiation. This prevents each comment from being perceived as an argument for or against a raise, and allows for more meaningful feedback. Employees, too, should adopt this mindset—seeing the review as a learning opportunity rather than purely financial.
  • Anchor goals in continuity: instead of focusing only on past results in one meeting, managers and employees should set progressive, realistic goals reviewed throughout the year. This continuous approach values effort and sustains motivation.
  • Focus on growth: the review should serve as a springboard for development. Managers highlight skills to strengthen, training opportunities, and career perspectives, while employees remain open to feedback and envision the review as a step toward future growth.

5 Practical Strategies to Reduce Stress Around Performance Reviews

Looking for concrete advice to approach your review with calm and confidence? Here are five key strategies.

1. Prepare a Structured File Instead of “Enduring” the Exchange

Traditionally, the review follows a manager’s agenda. But it should be a dialogue, not a one-sided evaluation.

Preparation is key. Employees can:

  • List achievements from the year, supported by tangible data and examples of soft skills (initiative, teamwork, autonomy),
  • Assess progress against previous goals,
  • Clarify expectations and aspirations (new responsibilities, skill development, internal mobility) and the support required (training, mentoring),
  • Structure their presentation for a clear, coherent message.

2. Maintain Ongoing Dialogue with Your Manager

The annual review should not be the only moment to exchange. Regular check-ins help:

  • Prevent misunderstandings,
  • Adjust goals to business realities,
  • Build trust gradually.

This ongoing dialogue eases pressure and fosters more open conversations during the review itself.

3. Practice Assertiveness and Active Listening

Both employees and managers benefit from cultivating active listening: giving full attention, reformulating ideas, asking open questions, avoiding snap judgments.

In parallel, assertiveness ensures needs and achievements are expressed clearly. Employees can better highlight contributions or request growth opportunities, while managers can deliver constructive feedback—even on sensitive topics.

Practical tools include:

  • The DESC method (Describe, Express, Suggest, Conclude),
  • Role-play exercises,
  • Working on non-verbal communication,
  • Mindfulness practices to strengthen focus.

4. Use Writing as a Support Tool

Writing a post-review summary or feedback note helps:

  • Process emotions (positive and negative),
  • Clarify impressions,
  • Confirm agreed next steps and objectives.

Managers, too, can prepare detailed summaries beyond the formal evaluation grid. This reassures employees that they were heard and creates a reference for future follow-ups.

5. Use Teale to Prepare Mentally and Afterward

For employees experiencing high stress, mental preparation is crucial. Teale’s workplace well-being platform can support this through:

  • Personalized stress-reduction modules,
  • Coaching sessions with professionals to prepare for the review, develop communication skills, and build confidence,
  • Post-review support to process the experience constructively.

Reconnecting Performance Reviews and Mental Health

Rather than fueling anxiety, reviews can strengthen a culture of listening, care, and support.

When structured as constructive exchanges, they:

  • Highlight achievements,
  • Clarify goals,
  • Co-create career perspectives.

This reduces anxiety linked to performance and shifts focus toward employees’ needs—improving both mental health and organizational resilience.

Conclusion: From Stressful Evaluation to Calm Dialogue

Performance reviews should not be reduced to targets and salary discussions—nor should they create overwhelming stress that makes them unproductive.

When conducted with respect, transparency, and constructive dialogue, reviews become valuable for both employees and the organization. They build trust, engagement, belonging, and support professional growth—all of which strengthen employer attractiveness, talent retention, and sustainable performance.

FAQ

Structured preparation is key: list achievements, clarify expectations, and practice assertiveness. Tools like Teale can also help manage stress beforehand.

There is usually no formal right to refuse, but you can request accommodations (in-person, rescheduled, or with support) by explaining your concerns. The goal is to ensure a constructive, calm exchange.

Stay anchored in facts: prepare points in advance, use breathing to regulate stress, and reformulate questions to buy time. Active listening also helps regain clarity.

Yes. Many companies favor regular, informal conversations instead of a single formal review. This continuous approach reduces pressure and encourages authentic, constructive exchanges.