HR Managers: How to Detect and Prevent Toxic Management
Spotting, addressing, and preventing toxic management is crucial for employee mental health and company performance. Here’s how.
Rising absenteeism is a real concern: it not only signals employee well-being issues, but it is also extremely costly for employers. Absenteeism generates direct financial expenses while also undermining productivity, employee morale, team cohesion, and employer reputation.
So how much does absenteeism actually cost? And is it even possible to calculate it precisely? Let’s break down the direct and indirect costs of absenteeism to get closer to an accurate calculation—and, more importantly, to understand why fighting absenteeism is a strategic necessity.
Absenteeism refers to the tendency of employees to be absent from work involuntarily or unexpectedly. It may include:
It is often measured using the absenteeism rate, which represents the percentage of working time lost due to absences compared to the total available working time.
Note: planned, authorized leave—such as vacation, training leave, or family leave covered by collective agreements—is not considered absenteeism.
Several studies have attempted to estimate the financial cost of absenteeism:
On average, absenteeism costs between €3,500 and €4,500 per employee per year.
But how can one absence become so expensive? Because behind a “simple absence” lies a multitude of hidden costs.
When an employee is absent due to illness, occupational disease, or even an unjustified reason, the financial impact is immediate. Let’s look at both direct and indirect costs.
These are the immediate costs linked to the absence itself:
Absenteeism almost always leads to reduced productivity:
These issues are similar to those caused by high employee turnover.
Absenteeism doesn’t only affect finances—it impacts the work environment:
All of these can erode morale, engagement, and mental health, creating a vicious cycle where absenteeism breeds more absenteeism.
Calculating absenteeism is challenging because many costs are indirect or hidden. Still, some useful parameters can help estimate the total impact.
Start with the absenteeism rate: the higher it is, the higher the costs. Then add measurable factors such as:
Don’t forget prevention costs: initiatives such as training, ergonomic workstations, or work-life balance policies. These should not be seen as “lost” expenses but as investments.
Effective prevention—through better management, clearer career paths, and improved mental health—can significantly reduce absenteeism and the long-term costs associated with it.
Absenteeism costs organizations far more than meets the eye—from direct payroll expenses to hidden productivity losses and deteriorating morale.
By understanding the types of costs and learning how to measure them, HR and leadership can build a strong case for preventive strategies. In the long run, investing in well-being and mental health saves money, strengthens resilience, and boosts competitiveness.